>>13179He's got a personal stake in this thing, obviously, so he wants to defend it. But that still leaves unanswered questions!Namely, how did he go from being completely open-minded about Jackson's claims to suddenly dismissing them entirely? Did he find evidence that proves them false, or is he just defending the status quo because he likes being comfortable? Inquiring minds want to know!
>>13181That's interesting, considering you're the one doing the accusing here.What's to save? Just asking questions based on everything we've seen so far. Whether or not I buy into these conspiracy theories isn't the point! I am simply pointing out that we don't actually know what led to her suicide yet, despite what The Professor might claim, and that should matter!
>>13178I know nothing! I'm just repeating what you've said! Now stop using quotes and talk normally for once.Nope! All I did was ask a question about what you call the "secrets". Which makes me wonder, though: What's your connection to The Professor, and why would you care about what he knows?
>>13182Excuse me if I read between the lines too much, but it almost feels like you're putting words in my
mouth.It is extremely frustrating when, after spending hours researching, writing notes and making connections, the last few minutes turn into a bunch of ad hominem attacks instead of actual discussion. Can we keep focused, please?
