>>504826196>denounces namedropping and personality postingI don't remember ever doing that... but I do remember being against such exercise for the sole purpose of dramamongering... then again I don't remember ever actively denouncing it or battling it at all, simply that I'd rather steer clear from it...? Is it so condamnable? I initially started visiting lolg to play league with friendly people, as might makes right, employing whatever power I might hold to preserve the warm circle I tried nurturing couldn't possible be held against me, much less calling me hypocrite for it, now could it? Yet I didn't, and many may attest, I never warred against anyone in my entire history of lolg, all the people I talked to in dms can say as much, I never participated in any conflict, and if I've ever given my opinion on anyone or anything at any point, it would have been to advise people to dissipate purposeless hostility with one another. You can ask Daschan, Firechan, Spinchan, Viposterchan, Nantochadkuchan, Swiftchan... or anyone really.
I'm really curious as to how I might have been a "catalyst" in previous euw dramas, let alone a "significant" one. The only thing I ever did was stop visiting lolg for a month or two, for personal reasons, and people closer to me are also aware of the ins and outs of it. As you might yourself partly be. Though I do understand the wroth outcry you manifest, I deny the dummy allegations entirely.
If EUW is pretty dead, and I have no part in it, many can confirm that I've always been trying to host norms, all together, without any cliqueing whatsoever, everybody invited at all times and still to this day, I do deplore the state of NA posting, and I was one of the first to call them friendly. It's, as always especially online, an affair of a few vociferating exponentially more than the rest and claiming to represent them. I would call it an insignificant poke if anything, in the face of an already solved and unfortunate situation...
