Servers are back up after system maintenance April 14. Feb 14-25 still awaits import.
Anonymous
Does /p/ shoot raw?
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>4050518 let me guess, you were born after film was already replaced with digital
Anonymous
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>4050389 Best reason, even if you don't ever edit, is being future proof and not have your photos forever clipped by present soft/hardware limitations.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
No.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>4050455 only watched one and never did again since then. he also shills alot here.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
Trip to Istanbul.
Anonymous
Thoughtful curation is 95% of photography. In contradistinction, this thread is a thoughtless, theme-less pile of tourist shit.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>4050308 true, but it's film and film simulations so it has "soul"
Anonymous
>post photos >some people come to your thread and sperg out with nothing constructive to say other than "toughtless pile of trash"
Anonymous
>>4050332 Why the fuck should I spend my time fixing xer photos when xe can't be bothered to take a millisecond out of xer thoughtless soomer fucking lives to think about a photograph—composition, colors, movement, light, literally fucking ANYTHING—before compulsively pressing the shutter button because
>OH HEY CAT ?
OH RIGHT I shouldn't. What I should do instead is tell them what I've told them: Your photos are fucking trash. Your thread is trash. Your eye is trash. Your life is trash. You are trash.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>4050335 >Why the fuck should I spend my time You shouldn't, fuck off back to /diy/
Anonymous
Nikon bros how do we keep on winning?>whopping 20mp APS-C >reverse flippy screen
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>4049493 EVF is being saved for the Z50 II
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>4050185 no it DOESNT you DUMMO!!!!!
it's a *DIFFERENT* camera all together.
APS-C
SWAPABLE LENS DESIGN
SCREEN FOLDS THE OTHER WAY
There I said it...
Anonymous
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>4049371 >anything more than 24fps looks like ass not on anyone's side but meme slowmo and speed ramps
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>4049360 >4k30 4:2:0 8 bit >No IBIS
Anonymous
Can sunset photos damage a mirrorless sensor?
Anonymous
Quoted By:
I thought it would be funny to do a 5 minute exposure wide open zoomed in to 200mm pointed straight at the sun and I've definitely noticed more hot pixels since doing it.
Anonymous
>>4050533 i've seen it happen during an eclipse, never during a sunset, I guess that's another fear to add to the list.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>4050541 especially when using a tele, it seems to act like a simple magnifying lens.
Anonymous
>>4050497 >Can sunset photos damage a mirrorless sensor? Yes. Depends on sun brightness and exposure. Note that the longer the focal length, the more you are amplifying the sun. (Technically, the more sunlight you are collecting and concentrating onto a spot on the sensor.)
So...a hazy sun shot on an UWA at f/11 with a fast shutter time? Probably OK.
Lingering on a bright sun, zero clouds/haze, while you frame it with a 300mm f/4 telephoto? Could definitely fuck things up.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>4050564 At that point you could damage the surface of a rock if it was at the end of the lens, ofc you'll wreck a sensor.
Anonymous
I went onto instagram today for the first time in months.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>4050578 The way I understand it is that if you post video content (reels) the algorithm will give you more exposure (random likes/followers, your post will appear more frequently in your current followers feed).
When I post pictures I usually get likes from random people (depending on the hashtags used) the very next few seconds after posting it but it stops there. I only post for family, close friends and the few people from /p/ that I added.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>4050578 Instagram has the same amount of male and female users, yet most of the content that gets to the top is female. That should give you an idea of what men do on the site vs women.
>The balance of male to female users is fairly evenly split, with total male users (50.7%) edging out total female users (49.3%) by just a hair.
Anonymous
/p/ bros i dont feel so good>Smartphone cameras and DSLRs have been moving in opposite directions for the past few years, and image quality from phones will finally trump that of their single-lens reflex rivals by 2024, according to Sony. >As reported by Nikkei Japan, the President and CEO of Sony Semiconductor Solutions (SSS), Terushi Shimizu, told a business briefing that "we expect that still images [from smartphones] will exceed the image quality of single-lens reflex cameras within the next few years". >But the broader conclusion remains – far from hitting a tech ceiling, smartphones are expected to continue their imaging evolution and, for most people, make standalone cameras redundant. >So what tech will drive this continued rise of the best phone cameras? Sony points to a few factors, including “quantum saturation” and improvements to "AI processing". Interestingly, Sony also expects the sensor size in "high-end model" phones to double by 2024. >The larger pixels on these sensors will, it says, allow phone makers to apply multi-frame processing that "realizes a new imaging experience", including improved Super HDR modes and zooms that combine folded optics (as on the Sony Xperia 1 IV) with AI algorithms.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>4049602 I have the Snoy Xperia 5 II. I mean... yeah headphone jack, it's "Made in Japan", it's not hard to root - but as a video and picture phone... it's a disappointment. Main camera can often match iPhone quality, but the superwide has a ton of chromatic and barrel distortion (even after software correction), and the telephoto is a piece of shit. The tele is a tiny 1/2.5" sensor with shit dynamic range and noise, as well as the autofocus mechanism is garbage which can't keep the lens aligned, so you get uneven focus across the frame.
It's a $1000 disappointment. I won't buy another one.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>4049597 >4/3 sensor >EF mount What were they thinking?
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>4038260 Good.
Photography hasn't been the same since CCD sensors stopped being the industry standard. CMOS is bland and sterile, like the industry
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>smartphones will kill dSLRs
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>4038260 >President and CEO of Sony Semiconductor Solutions >says anything on this matter >nobody buys Sony phones What did they mean by this
Anonymous
Sup, /p/
Anonymous
>>4050506 If you're at the level where you can just edit on your phone, then the standard phone editing software is good enough bud. Outside of this if you have a laptop or computer even if it's shit then torrent.
related, but isn't GIMP free?
Anonymous
>>4050506 What specific tools / functionality do you need that LR Mobile or Snapseed don't have?
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>4050520 >>4050522 Don't have a laptop/pc, atm. Many tools taken for granted in any basic freeware in windows seem simply inexistent/exotic/require multiple tools (and lossy saves), in android (ex.: fill area tool, cut/copy/paste selection, collate, convert formats, etc).
Android (X)GIMP has a 2.5 rating and is full of ads, from the reviews.
Really basic pic oriented file editing stuff, not leet post stuff. Just that it seems everything little thing I did in IrfanView/xnview without even giving it a thought, takes me on a wild goose chase in android.
Anonymous
Anonymous
Quoted By:
anyone else love distant haze? post hazy long distance photos
Anonymous
Anonymous
>>4049607 I inferred the spirit of the thread to include things like atmospheric moisture that becomes part of the subject due to distance
Anonymous
>>4049814 Haze is more about colloidal particle matter in the atmosphere on clear days
Anonymous
Anonymous
Anonymous
Quoted By:
Last bread reached bump limit. We laugh at nophotos with giant DSLRs who are too afraid to shoot in public.
What's your EDC?
O-M5 Delayed
https://www.43rumors.com/om-digital-postponed-the-om-5-launch-til-late-september-early-october/ AVP continues his M43 obsession
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f1BhHvr3NP8
Anonymous
Anonymous
I'm giving a friend some advice for buying his first camera, he wants something compact but with a modicum of zoom so I suggested the em10 iii with the 12-60 pana. He says that it still seems bigger than he likes though, should I just tell him to just get a compact at this point? I thought about the oly pancake but it's only 3x and not that good, and I can't think of a smaller camera
Anonymous
>>4050191 you must have good glass to project good photo
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>4050195 yeah but you also need to know what you are doing a little to really see the difference, especially with good compacts like the lx100 or an rx100 compared to an inexpensive mft lens. I'll tell him that if he really gives a fuck about learning photography he's better off getting a system with interchangeable lenses so he has a lot more room to experiment in the future and the possibility to buy better lenses
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>4046098 Magnolia flowers are really cool. They are among the most primitive flowers still found, and within large trees, they might be the most basal/primitive. At the same time they aren't a true living fossil, as their flowers *have* been evolving. They are not identical to fossil magnolias.
Anonymous
I can't figure this shit out. Tried Premiere Pro, way too complex and had my brain exploding. Tried Filmora, it was much more understandable but the end product looked worse and had visible pixelation. What's a good video editing software for a beginner? All I need to do is add saturation, brightness, and up the whites a bit so nothing too complex is necessary. Do any of you have a go-to for film editing? Preferably free but paid is ok too.
Anonymous
>>4049176 whats a good free video editing software for youtube videos
Anonymous
Anonymous
>>4050512 I'd say it's overly complex for youtube stuff, and doesn't work unless you have a top of the line computer anyway. It's not compatible with any of my laptops, I had to run it on an old XPS gaming desktop and it still runs slow and crashes. The latest versions of Resolve are made only for top of the line systems, considering it's legitimate pro software and they want cutting edge.
Filmora was very easy to use, and had a ton of built in filters so you don't have to figure out how to tweak color wheels. I'd pirate that to keep it simple, but definitely wouldn't pay for it. The free version adds a watermark that they don't tell you about until you've already completed your project. If your computer can run it, Resolve is great but just skip the color tweaking tab or keep it basic.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>4050531 >The latest versions of Resolve are made only for top of the line Um what? I'm using a 4690k non overclocked, 16GB of cheapo RAM and a 4GB low end GPU (which is not even used in the free version). Runs smooth as silk and export times are great. Resolve doesn't add any kind of watermark, it's loaded with features but very well laid out, it's your fault that you can't into computer.
Enjoy your "MADE WITH BANDICAM" software made for babbies.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
Shotcut is great, basic everything and solid but you didn't want too much complexity.
