Read this post at least three times because you won't get it the first time. You have poor research skills, poor reading comprehension skills, and poor critical thinking skills, but you feel the need to go on the Internet and DEBOOOOOK statements. That shit is annoying, and I'd like you to stop.
You go on here telling people you proved it wasn't ESG, but the result of a downsizing by Lee Enterprises, based on a post from some faggot on twitter. A couple problems:
1) You should have linked the press statement from Lee Enterprises instead. A faggot on twitter is not a source. By the way, that post you linked was removed.
2) Their press statement doesn't prove definitively that ESG wasn't the reason. Think! Would a corporation make a statement that they fired people based on race? Is it not possible that they're lying?
I think Dilbert was most likely removed because of downsizing. Scott Adams seems to be overeager to jump to the conclusion that he was discriminated against because it's happened to him twice before. I do have to admit the timing is suspicious that he got removed after submitting comic strips making fun of ESG, but that doesn't prove his case. Maybe someone had it out for him and is using downsizing as an excuse, but I'd need more evidence to change my mind.