>>375441Correction: But also what you(Renz) said about Social Media Influencers.*
>>375440Lmao if that's what you think, as long as you've considered the other side too. I don't agree with it but I can see why it has some upsides. But I still can't help but think it is subjective. Saying that someone shouldn't be able to vote because they are "retarded". Who should decide if their opinion is rubbish? THE GOVERNMENT???
>"Oh everyone who does not vote for us in the upcoming election will have their voting rights revoked for being retarded"Also the women thing, I guess this is just a diverging opinion based on our culture. Women's suffrage happened aorund 100 years ago in the UK and it had a massive affect on the West. Btw you should Google the Women's Suffrage movement and 'Emily Davidson'.
>>375442lol if he comes here we can just move back hehehehe
