>>6025Hrmph! Of course you're not even quoting me accurately anymore, at least give me credit for being consistent.I do agree with you though, in theory. There's nothing sadder than thinking your over-the-top speeches actually sway anyone to your side. Until I meet you, I remain in blissful ignorance regarding the rest of your interests! No, I probably wouldn't enjoy them anyway.I wish I'd taken a screenshot of you calling yourself editor-in-chief, I forgot. Don't worry, I'll trust that sentence at face value!
>>6027An excellent question! Though I've heard it alleged that someone here is so proud of their body hair that they're basically immune to that criticism. Who might that be?A bit baffling that you don't seem to associate with my poem! Two minutes ago you accused me of having no self-awareness, but now you're just summarising my entire poem in several short sentences. Not to mention
>>6024Uh, no. That'snotmyself-description. The original editors-in-chief say that they curate news articles and articles here, and claim to have carefully vetted contributions. Unless they changed roles, and I missed it.I know I've argued with some people here, sure, but that doesn't qualify as projection! So what if I don't even know what you mean by that term, and feel annoyed that I've gotta explain myself?
>>6028Don't pretend like you care about defence strategies; you've been attacking people here relentlessly. Naive about the subject?! They're just rambling nonsensical statements and I respond. I also thought it was a given that I'd react defensively. Now that's annoying! This isn't my first rodeo, you know! So your points fall flat.
