>>10190Going for the classic insult-and-threat combo, huh? So now I'm a pedant because I've been calling out inconsistencies? Again, assuming you didn't plagiarise someone's writing style. But it turns out I've been doing this to help improve our discussions! Since we were going over abstract issues and losing sight of reality, and since I've noticed this board used to love debating. The latter point applies generally, but the former would apply particularly to the last time we talked about *that*.I am incredibly curious now, though!
>>10192Anyway, I'm heading to bed now, so good night everyone! Sleep well! I wish the best for the person who started this whole train of thought, though I've forgotten whose it originally was. Thanks for clearing that up!I'm glad you're feeling optimistic! You think you'll find the answers you're searching for? Whatever that entails. For me it's the mystery of God (but I consider that solved), plus depression, plus the mind-body problem, and I recently found out about a ton of different philosophies I hadn't considered
>>10189Substance of the discussion? I'd like to know what you're referring to! This thread seems to consist mainly of insults, though I think it started out with a particular topic in mind.I'm clearly not perfect myself, but mocking someone's character and credibility is most definitely part of the rules! Anything less than a basic understanding of logic leads to confusion and misinformation. At least it seems like some
>>10193To paraphrase Wittgenstein (in his Philosophical Investigations): "Whereof one cannot speak, thereof one must remain silent." Plus assuming that I, of all people, am dodging questions is amusing. And though I love lying, I assure you I'm telling the truth when I claim I had no reason to think that specific thing would have been responded to. Nowhere in the post did I mention the post, nor was there any obvious connection between the post and anything I might say. It's easy to make people look like they're
