>>7742"I'm not 'responseless' because your Webster-defined 'impossible to respond to' statement lacks substance, arrogant bastardsso vacant of meaningful content.
>>7744"You selfish, ignorant jerkoff, I've satisfied personal satisfaction by punishing you for your obliviousness about the-expansion-as-energy phenomenon, and I'll happily repeat myself ad nauseum if that's all you've got.
>>7741"All capshite and useless trends aside, you bloody fool, a motivated energy expansion causes your precious 'document' to cease existing, whereas I continue to exist outside of your perceived 'language trends'.
>>7745"You bothered to Google it? How sweet, regardless of your arrogant demeánHowever, I'll gladly answer your vain questions.
