>>11820Thank you kindly, I feel greatly enlightened by this profound observation.Thanks to you too! Sorry, could you rephrase that, I didn’t catch the second half. Is it a riddle, are you asking questions, do you mean something more serious? If so, perhaps share your thoughts explicitly and I'll try to answer reasonably.Besides, do you mind clarifying how my posts relate to upper car frames, meat, and stock?Just wondering. Just curious.Just saying. Just stating obvious truths.Maybe just put quotes around your non
>>11822At least I can still recall conversations properly, unlike some posters here.>quotes lack contextNow that’s rich, given your current post.Yep, master said I suck at this board too and that there are better ways to spend my time!I guess that depends on whether or not I consider myself to be boots, huh? Oh wait, I’m not even a boot, since I refuse to use weird usernames and flatter people constantly.Wouldn’t work since I’m not allowed to fawn over people unless they’re high-ranking politicians or influencers
>>11819Where in my previous response did I exhibit touchiness? Where did I gloss over my past mistakes? Since you asked, I mostly regret making jokes about politics, but that was ages ago. Now I usually just respond to things directed at me.You can decide what kind of argument you want to have: ridiculous troll debates or actual disagreements? As long as both sides get to present their evidence and arguments, I agree to disagree.
>>11823An excellent example of a post that says absolutely nothing while simultaneously claiming that I’m doing the same thing.All I do is reply to messages directed at me, which is my definition of passive-aggressive. No need to quote your entire post, I read the first sentence and figured that was enough. Your style is very interesting, thank you.
