>>6001For once though, I genuinely have no clue what this post is supposed to mean. The salesman being a "can-do" person despite claiming to have perfect hearing suddenly matters, I suppose?And sure, it makes sense! Too bad it was buried under a wall of complete gibberish.What were the slanted monoliths again? A new symbol for your imaginary poems? Anybody else noticed how they keep using quotation marks around words, like they're actual speech bubbles? It's starting to look fake.
>>6003Not funny? I, uh, gave you feedback on your poetry, and you responded poorly, is what I gathered.I said earlier that my goal is to spark interesting discussions, not to win an award for funniest poster (though apparently that's what your friends tell you.)
>>6000> objective debateWho was saying that? Anyone remember any of the sane posts? Can't find them anywhere.Thanks! Since, according to you, I showed them their grave mistakes.>>6004Wow, raving reviews keep pouring in: More arrogant than someone who thinks they alone are right all the time and keep referring to themselves as the "editor-in-chief"?With regards to the first accusation, I literally asked someone here if they liked deconstructing narratives too, and I posted an example of how that manifests for me with Gucci Mane songs, I assume that counts.Young Robert Plant wants you to know that there's a difference between debating and trolling, and when trolls dismissively call each other names and only use generic buzzwords about
