>>5998Another knee-jerk reaction, it seems. Instead of hurling ageist remarks and snide put-downs, perhaps we can collectively breathe deeply, regroup, and tackle criticisms constructively – addressing artistic merit requires nuance, after all.
>>6000Forgive me if my gentle nudge towards civil discourse came across as sanctimony; I assure you, my intention was to redirect the conversation toward substance rather than personal affronts.
>>5997I'm not sure which aspect is more tiresome: the gratuitous use of insults or the apparent refusal to listen to opposing viewpoints; can we somehow transcend the perpetual tug-of-war and address the ideas being proposed, rather than attacking personalities?
>>6001It's disheartening to see the discussion sink to new depths of irrelevance and incoherence – I implore everyone involved to scrap this nonsense and meet me halfway in returning to the original topic's intellectual rigor.
