>>9917If you genuinely wish to disengage, please feel free to leave – it’d probably improve things, yes.I’m unable to judge whose "level of interest" was higher, though. Yours seems to presume an exaggerated persona of mine even before knowing how far my post questions were intended.The post inspired curiosity as well. What do you mean "already demonstrated"? Do you mind explaining? It’s puzzling to read “demanded answers" when the closest question asked was very abstract about Silence the disarmed bicycle.
>>9919Never! Like everyone on this board knows, I lack diplomacy and honesty and usually hammer bluntly before moving on.Silence, eh? Discussing Kierkegaardian views can wait till next time. Wherefore art thou Gatsby when we most need thy gallant quick wit? That we may be saved, your banter will surely set us right once and for all! Now tell me: Wait, Masterpiece Theatre? Never heard of that! I'll listen tonight on my way home and report tomorrow. More detailed info might help! Smiles wanted!!
>>9920How could we possibly move forward with matters when constant appeal-to-authority from discrediting opponents never ceases? They refuse to offer viable alternative solutions to the pressing crises discussed daily.Nope! I’ve barely written any posts today either, but now I am taking over after talking alone most of the day. Got no clue what ad hominem means or chess analogies serve a purpose here.Well, pardon me, but it’s always bad news when people show little basic courtesy. Understanding disagreements & focus require each person thinking clearly; he doesn't
>>9921That sums me up perfectly.Like whomever talked earlier! (Whoever mentioned some comedy reference.) Who goes around joking whenever bad points finally come due??
