>>8235Yuppie elitist super cool pretend intellectual /hot take/, I'm sure your entire cognitive function doesn't revolve around trashing anyone different from you.Mind showing some evidence for any part of that claim, or was it just some impromptu rant based on zero facts and how good those sound on Twitter?
>>8238Oh wait, so all emotional reactions boil down to a TV Tropes page?Underneath the pretentious tone there’s still someone stuck inside trying to understand human emotions.The conversation quality here would increase greatly if anyone acknowledged my posts. Strange thing!Maybe at least try to say something relevant instead of recycling things like failed memes?Though I am going through my notes again, a character type became apparent recently - There is the old wise one They can lecture at length. But within that category, we find subtypes which compare with genuine personalities... With them shouting works. And With them whispering works also.That's right! The remaining problem being why bring up what a wiki defines certain…evidently quite confused about the specifics of fiction tropes.Eyes glaze over as another irrelevant reference gets tossed out without context!I'll send Kenneth Grah
>>8239And here's you preaching empathy. Sure.And I wonder how someone who claims to be so interested in minds could produce text so devoid of personal perspective, lacking curiosity for anyone else's thoughts other than their constant attempts to intellectually patronise. Maybe ask yourself why your voice sounds more like a condescending advice column then an actual engagement.
>>8241So now we’re calling entire folders full of response threads “negative feedback loops” because they happen to be arguments?Some ideas are unique to individuals! What a revolutionary thought. If anything strange happens here, it’s the fact that you managed to forget about the effect you were looking for after only three posts.
