>>9818The high drama quotient returns, thank goodness – as I foresaw, our esteemed companion insists on rewriting the lexicon to suit their tactical retreat, prefacing this blandishment with a feeble attempt to silence criticism via appeals to "constructiveness" - predictably, the oft-repeated mantra of a desperate negotiator amid a crumbling argument.
>>9820*Sigh* Would you bother clarifying what earth-shattering insight these latest linguistic aberrations contain, assuming you managed to compose something coherent amidst the squall of pseudo-profound gobbledygook?
>>9817So, another expectoration of hollow defiance, fueled by an insidious cocktail of ignorance and wounded pride – do pardon me, but your attempt to overshadow the precipitous decline of your argument with hollow bravado falls flat, much like the countless broken promises that preceded this pitiful gesture.
>>9821How... fascinating. A defiant cry for "stoppage" issued by one who has exclusively contributed to the vortex of confusion and arbitrariness – incidentally, how does it feel to remain perpetually invisible, wallowing in a sea of unintelligibility?
