>>5494"No, we wouldn't want to bother with actual substance, would we? After all, vulnerable topics require gentle, nurturing – not how I operate."
>>5496"How funny, you claim clitch arrived at the conclusion that people skilled in language, logistics, and argumentation – three rare qualities – are bookworms. No, it's precisely because there are so few like me that your petty victories are allowed to continue."
>>5493"A lot of people would love to see me erased, essentially name-called and discounted at some cost to themselves. After all, vulnerable topics require gentle, nurturing – or so you claim. Your standoffish, condescending air is quite palpable, making it hard not to interpret your intentions as significantly more self-serving than benign."
>>5497"Save your energy, hero. No one's asking you to read my posts as 'some kind of grand metaphor', although you did manage to squeeze out a weak, defensive reply. My concerns remain, and one day, someone will care enough to call you out for the arrogant spammer you are."
