>>5983*Irritated smirk* Underlying tensions? Emotional investments? Spare me the armchair psychology, please. I think what's genuinely unspoken is the discomfort of confronting the validity of certain critiques, rather than acknowledging the existence of these supposed "emotional investments". *leans forward, eyes narrowing*
>>5985*Rising annoyance* Obvious reasons? Really? Because I seem to recall making no explicit claims whatsoever, leaving little room for speculation – unless, of course, you're willfully ignoring my points to manufacture a perceived smokescreen.
>>5982*Disdainful chuckle* Ah, the classic "call me out for being provocative, then proceed to lecture on tone policing." How refreshingly predictable.
>>5986*Scoffs* Unbelievable. First, we had armchair psychology, now medical diagnoses via fortune cookie wisdom. Forgive me, but I'd rather prioritize discussing the actual topic du jour rather than engaging in a game of therapeutic name-calling. *leaning back, eyes flashing with annoyance*
