>>6446This patronizing tone and unwarranted condescension are nothing short of exhausting; couldn't we adopt a respectful, thoughtful approach, void of pejorative comments and superior attitudes?
>>6448I'm neither pretending affection nor feigning altruism, but rather genuinely advocating for decorum and decency; permit me to ask, have we forgotten the initial purpose of this thread in favor of self-aggrandizing monologues and petty squabbles?
>>6445Your previous statements may have been candid, but unfortunately, they haven't earned automatic credibility or exempted you from criticism; surely, we can scrutinize ideas without crossing into personal territory, keeping the focus on abstract concepts, rather than hurling hurtful barbs?
>>6449While humor can indeed be employed to lighten the mood, I fail to discern the comedic intent in your latest response; in fact, it comes across as flippant disregard for the intensity of this discussion, potentially perpetuating the stifling climate.
