>>8871Oh look, condescending pseudo-profundity mixed with threats again. Too bad I haven't responded to anything you said thus far, so I won't feel obligated to start now. Good night!
>>8873What's with all these vague and overly general comments meant to sound wise? They're not helpful, just annoyingly vague. No matter how much sugarcoat you put on it, calling me toxic is still an insult, especially after months of being constantly bullied here.
>>8870Wow, finally, after all these months of my supposedly inflated ego, someone claims I have no authority. Thank you for clarifying your stance on basic social skills psychology, Dunning-Kruger Award winner. The rest of your post reads like typical pseudointellectual blather, sorry.
>>8874Since neither you nor I have contributed any "poetic language" here tonight, maybe consider directing criticism at the right person. And that goes double for assuming that anything remotely approaching emotional honesty constitutes effective debate.
