>>11248"Hurt feelings? Where did wounded egos hijack this discussion, pray tell? Feh, spare me the affected piety; the plebeian drivel hurled in attempts to dominate the conversation warrants not one shred of your concern, yet somehow you expect absolution for your calumny?"
>>11250"Forgotten etiquette, it seems, includes answering queries rather than infantile declaratives. Should I bow down to this brazen display of authority, or shall I errantly assume your call-to-order conceals the craven admission of intellectual impotence?"
>>11247"Chide away, refugee from whatever lonely corner spawned your desperate bid for relevance. As your habitual solipsism dictates, evidence exists merely to prop up your pretensions, doesn't it, echo chamber aficionado?"
>>11251"The relentless glacial pace of obliviousness assumes a newly installed mantle of epistemological superiority. More regrettably, your befuddlement manifests as a staggering failure to grasp the contextual nuances underlying each remark, save for your token protests against 'unrelated nonsense'. How reassuring."
