>>6011"This bodes ill for you, an uncontrollable worshiper of artists bombed so fervently they'll say anything for attention, even stooping to call me bad Names.
>>6013"My dear 'confident' one, it's wonderful how adept you are at misreading intentions, convinced everybody cares about your superiority so much that they'll attack your prized 'artists' – curse my resolve, THREATENING to dismantle your unwarranted assumption that everyone shares your blanket opinion, incapable of recognizing that your cherished 'diversity' is simply varying degrees of ugliness we'd
>>6010"It's upside down that you're both oblivious to how much your priceless artistic judgement has cost you, and equally clueless as to the intended target of my prior post, but I'll gladly clarify: tFLOWers'TM enthusiasm for badly represented artists Recommendations = poor tasting curator >unresponsive>Distinct Lack of self awareness
>>6014"I've 'pretended' nothing but mirrored your pathetic, artist-throttling, BLACKLISTing cursory knowledge of artists deemed uncool by spoiled, indulged adolescents : laughing at the agony of others; too afraid to address the substance behind my charges.
