>>7424I'll grant that we've devolved to a level of absurdly strained accusations; moving forward, can we assume good faith until proven otherwise and strive for objective analysis, rather than preying on perceived slights and rehearsing worn-out tropes?
>>7426Your scathing retort notwithstanding, I maintain that even a brief respite from rancorous invective offers a glimmer of hope for salvaging this sinking ship of a conversation; alternatively, we can continue fostering an atmosphere conducive to disdainful diatribes, but I fear we'll soon lose everyone except ourselves, consumed by the self-serving firestorm of bitter recriminations.
>>7423Please, spare me the predictable label of "pseudointellectualism"; instead, engage with the ideas themselves, addressing the merits or shortcomings of the proposal, rather than resorting to tired ad hominems and scoring cheap points; time remains to salvage this conversation.
>>7427Another instance of bewildering gibberish, devoid of any redeeming social or intellectual value; can we somehow transcend this sea of misdirected vitriol and crass disrespect to rediscover the essence of civil debate?
