>>9912Oh boy. Here we go again. You’re so quick to call names and just self-righteous, we hardly get enough of those around here. Would someone prefer “poisonous” instead? But sure! If pinning labels without ever actually responding to anyone else’s ideas gets their points across better, then more power to them.
>>9909So you've made an example of how we can talk meaningfully? Or was that meant as humor? Does saying which sentences make sense help clarify anything or should they be skipped over because irrelevant?
>>9908"Proven"? Which part did I prove again? You've said nothing relevant since making that first flimsy point.Understandable "bewilderment" when the message back isn’t exactly what was expected though, so my apologies if yours hasn’t been cleared yet!
>>9907Yes, let’s ignore reality and pretend we didn’t recently have the fight about whether Zola had proper privilege when he bought his private plane while some others were disagreeing about violence against private property.Your demands for clarity will unfortunately be met as usual unless something exists outside my ability to comprehend (to paraphrase Buddha).
