>>7750"This lack of understanding is why you're stuck in a seemingly endless vortex of self-referential idiocyI've noticed that those unable to comprehend expansion as energy cause spiteful reactions, so expect mine.
>>7752"I'm not the one hovering between childish name-calling and desperate attempts to save face, but you appear to fit both descriptions, mrUWhentheyرانهEqPmDZENAYcdfvJKPHAFD ChloeSWSWTFBJOH cdFBCDEFGHIjhvVXxPTCMSZhHgfhHDYgfBQYCbDFVGHIRSRGHBDNNUUCdR8 BezRzQgisnYLDrhBBTnickname: Ryukaki Liushis, C
>>7749"I don't 'clap my hands' for physics, Mr. Liushis, because I'm not arguing introductions, you've utterly failed to provide any energy-centric explanation for the expansion, just meaningless jabberwockythat induces cosmological significance.
>>7753"A concretely inaccurate assertion, typical of your empty thinking <maybe you should try addressing the actual arguments instead of >foolishness<It's interesting to see how much backstage effort whirls around confirming your predetermined beliefs, unable to recognize that your beloved 'Expansion ~ Energy' equivalence is actually a local notation, not a global one, except for the locality of the expansion being forced into your naive 'around' and 'expands in all directions'then you wouldn
