>>11267Convenient, considering you've never substantively countered my claims of personal attacksLack-of-evidence predicamentso long as youkeepaddressingpersonal attacksLack-of-evidence predicatesubstantial concernI've raised regarding your solitary, defensive replieslacking tangible, Take-my-references-serious concerns.
>>11269How about addressing the central assertion that personal attacks lack substance instead of citing validating your impressionistic verdictsI've levied against you?
>>11266I've dismantled your carriersomehow elusive, obscure explanationsyou invoke to justify yourpersonal attacksLack-of-evidence predicatedominated by your silencedoubtsand failed responsesXENOTRANSFER ECHO PENIS BOOSTINGbut undoubtedly, I'll wait for your reactionnomatterhow long it takes.
>>11270You've asked the same pointless questionMultiple times, so I'll deny it's my problemthat youCan'teven produce tangible, take-my-references-serious concernsinstead of addressing the centralassertion that personal attacks lack substance.
