>>8562All this could’ve been avoided if you’d simply admitted to altering quotes. Instead, you chose to attack me relentlessly, which further proves the integrity of the discussion.
>>8564And so begins another round of dramatic theatrics.Sure, objective examination sounds great. Go ahead. Since when did you suddenly care about objective examination?
>>8561Finally, after weeks, the infamous poet returns. Good timing! However, since you’re so concerned about shallow understanding, I assume you won’t mind explaining what you meant by “tyranny of numbers”.
>>8565I certainly hope that wherever you got that impression, it was based on verifiable fact.
