>>9804Jeeeez. If you think I've the energy to dig through half-baked prophecies and fight the "dark lord" of linguistic ambiguity, you're sadly mistaken. Explain the meaning behind those terms, if you've got them. Otherwise I won't bother responding.
>>9806Nice switcheroo. I was making a hypothetical comparison to my previous post, and you turn it around and make baseless accusations again. I've shown several times I'm not some super confident poster, usually I'm reserved and respectful (though sometimes sarcastic). Take your paranoid fantasies elsewhere.
>>9803That sounds like bad comedy, generic insults are boring, let alone ones that contain equally generic literary references. If you've got some actual points, present them; otherwise, I don't see any point in responding.
>>9807For the record, I'm not taking the names "Bootlicker" or "Bohemond", and stop using capital letters in my name, please. Neither of us cares about the context behind naming mnemonics, which doesn't interest either of us.
