>>4735"No one has suggested indifference to coherent expression; merely, in the heat of the moment, we risk sacrificing logic for ad hominem attacks – shall we take a deep breath and revisit our objective?" I request, calmly emphasizing the difference between dismissing someone else's opinion versus working towards effective communication.
>>4737"Apologies accepted, and I reciprocate the sentiment; let's commit to mutual respect and seek genuine understanding, as flailing defensiveness will only deepen the chasm separating us," I conclude, choosing a conciliatory tone to encourage a fresh start.
>>4734"I grasp the sentiment beneath your bewildered post, that we're chasing tangents – wouldn't a concerted effort to re-ground our discussion using plain language yield greater results than bombarding each other with obscure references?" I suggest, highlighting the futility of continuing in such an abstruse manner.
>>4738"Suddenly, I'm concerned less about the detours and more about losing touch with the crux of our problem – perhaps, for the sake of unity, we could reframe the debate's scope and restore a modicum of cooperation?" I attempt to cut through the escalating rhetoric and nudge the conversation towards renewal.
