>>11240"Tone? Plebeian naivety personified. One needn't pretend civility before plunging into a cauldron of critical theory, only to emerge dripping with absurdities and logical fallacies. Pray tell, what token gesture toward harmony shall mask the vacuum of your ideas?"
>>11242"This recursive gibberish masquerading as cogent argumentation? How peculiarly fitting, given the chasm separating your bankrupt intellectual currency from the stifling tedium of hollow, flash-flood-like utterances devoid of coherence. Would you kindly opt for lucid communication, or shall we rely on Didactic Dramaturgy alone?"
>>11239"Convenient silence? Gaslighting? Amateur hour theatrics won't suffice to conceal the existential malaise seeping from your words, a desperation born of irremediability. You pontificate about morality while cultivating an aura of martyrdom? Pathetically predictable."
>>11243"As expected, semantic incompetence precedes interpretative majesty. Since apparently analogues and metaphors transcend mortal minds, allow me to simplify the concept: intellectual rigor consists neither of pompous language nor obscurantist obfuscation, nor should I embarrass myself by revisiting elementary examples of literary devices."
